Science and other stuff

This week my reading of Orwell and Niebuhr has taken a bit of a back seat as I decided to finish "The Language of God" by Francis Collins, a book I came across last week. Collins is basically expressing the view that a person can believe in God and science, including evolution.  I have to say that being brought up in a fairly liberal minded home, where my dad was a scientific officer for the health service running a hospital laboratory, there has never been any doubt for me about this. As I read the words of professor Collins I found such a view reinforced. What I did find particularly encouraging was his acknowledgement of the sincerity of those who might not agree with him. I do wonder whether some of the divisions in our world sometimes are the result of people insisting on their viewpoint being accepted above all others, rather than acknowledging others may stand on other ground, which for them is equally valid. The question may be how do we all find common ground in such situations without compromising our position? John Wesley's sermon on "A Catholic Spirit" explores this. For an example see:

http://www.crivoice.org/cathspirit.html

I have not completely neglected Niebuhr and Orwell. I have done a bit of reading about Niebuhr as well as what he wrote. In the 1920's and 30's he was critical of the Protestant churches liberal position and preaching of a social gospel. It seems that his point is that it was not a very realistic position as it suggested human progress would continue to be positive and with the help of reason humanity would solve all of its problems.  I think there is something in what Niebuhr is saying that is worth pursuing. In our present situation what is the message the church should be giving? How can we express a hope in the future, because of our hope in Christ, that is realistic and meaningful to all people and not wishful thinking?

Finally, in Burmese Days the arrival of Elizabeth looks like stirring up things in the British Community. When asked were she has come from she replies Paris. Immediately it is thought that she has led a somewhat glamorous life. When Orwell back-fills the story we discover it is anything but. Sometimes it is easy to jump to conclusions about people based on where they come from, conclusions that are not always borne out by reality. Listening to peoples story with more care may help us all avoid this.

Loving God

We thank you for science

and scientists, especially at this time

when they are working so hard to find 

ways to overcome the coronavirus.

Guide them and protect them in all of their work

Help us to appreciate the majesty of your creation through science

To see your hand in those discoveries 

that tell us more about our world and ourselves.

We pray for your wisdom in all our relationships;

in times when we might disagree

in times when we are tempted to judge others by where they come from.

Help us to show your love to everyone and even be prepared to change our views 

when we are guided by your spirit to do so.

Amen

Every good deed?

In the opening chapter of Orwell's " Burmese Days" we are introduced to U Po Kyin, a local official who has  gained his position, power and wealth often by unscrupulous means. Being a Buddhist he believes in reincarnation. What he returns as will depend on the life he has lead. Is he worried about this in view of all the bad things he has done? The answer is no. He will use the wealth accrued to pay for the building of lots of pagodas just before he dies. These good deeds will outweigh all the bad deeds previously committed and he should be assured of not being reincarnated as a slug.

This got me thinking about the reasons we do good deeds. At the moment there are many helping as volunteers in all sorts of ways and this is helping many people in all sorts of ways. I would be surprised if such people thought that they were building up some kind of positive balance sheet for the hereafter, so why are they doing it? 

Just recently Dr Francis Collins was awarded the Templeton prize as reported in this article:

 https://premierchristian.news/en/news/article/christian-geneticist-francis-collins-awarded-prestigious-templeton-prize

After reading the above article I bought his book and I am now reading this too. Early in the book Dr Collins talks about the Moral Law as explained by CS Lewis.  This tells us that humans, no matter where they are, somehow know the difference between right and wrong. Even if we do not always adhere to this through selfish choices; even if there are differences about how this is responded to; there is still an appeal to a higher standard.

So perhaps when we are doing good  things, sometimes for complete strangers,  this is our response to the moral law.  Has God put in place this law along with all the other laws that hold the universe together? Is there something within us that makes us respond in certain ways? Is this is a reflection of our maker?

Without doubt there are still people who act in ways that are purely selfish. This is perhaps one of the consequences of free will as we are free to choose good or evil. There are also those who do good for what they can get out of it in the form of status or some type of feeling that they are a good person. This may not always be a bad thing if others are helped, but I do wonder whether is should be the motivating factor.

Perhaps when humans do good in a truly altruistic way it is then that we can truly catch a glimpse of the face of God.

Gracious God

You sent your son Jesus
to be our saviour and in him

we have a model in how to
do good.

We thank you for all those
who are volunteering at this
time to help others. May your
hand of protection be over them
and those they are helping in these
challenging times.

Help us to know when and
how to help others;
Place in our hearts the desire
to do all the good we can
in ways that bring glory not to
us but to you.

Amen

Down and Out with Orwell in London

I have just finished reading George Orwell's " Down and out in Paris and London". In the second part of the book Orwell find himself homeless in the London area. As I read of his experiences a range of thoughts go through my mind about charity and the church. There are a number of occasions when Orwell goes to a church for a free meal, usually tea, bread, or the like. Once fed there is the expectation that the homeless stay on for some type of religious service, in one case the men are even expected to kneel down and pray. Orwell comments that this type of charity is not really liked by the men. There is a resentment at the expectation that they should be grateful for the charity offered them. Now Orwell is not really critical of the church people giving out the charity as he sees good intent in what they are doing, but as the old saying goes "the way to hell is paved with good intentions".  It got me thinking about the reasons people have for giving to charity, or doing charitable works. If as a Christian I am trying to follow Jesus as my model for life then I should try to help people when I can. But when I am doing this I should not expect anything in return, even if sometimes the experience is disappointing. When Jesus healed ten leapers only one returned, and that, a Samaritan ( Luke 17: 11- 19). I sense a note of disappointment, even sadness in what Jesus says: "Were there not ten cleansed?", but even so the other nine still were healed. So I wonder if we are going be involved in any type of charity, especially with people who do not always fit in with societies expectations, we should do so as a sign of our love of God and our fellow humans, not for some sense that we have done good.

At the time of Orwell there were still workhouses and attached to these were "spikes", places were tramps could stay overnight. These were very institutionalised. When you went in you gave over all your belongings, including clothes and put on some type of uniform. The standard bread and tea, sometimes cocoa was given and you were allotted a cell or bed in a dormitory.  In the morning your belongings were returned and after a breakfast and inspection by a doctor (apparently to check for smallpox not to help with any ailments), you were given some bread and cheese and sent off on the road again. By law you could only stay at a spike once a month, twice at some London ones. Registers were kept of all who stayed.  Such places are long gone but homelessness is not. The issues homeless people face may be different to the tramps Orwell got to know, but it seems that almost a hundred years since Orwell wrote about these things, people still find themselves "on the road".  In thinking about the situation in his time Orwell saw providing work for the tramps as a way to help resolve the situation. He suggests that they work on farms attached to the workhouses to grow their own food. This could also help improve the status of the tramps and even help them eventually settle down.

Today there are many marvellous charitable organisations that provide a home and training for people in need and who for all sorts of reasons have become homeless. As a result many lives are changed for the better.

Dear God

We pray for all those who seek

to offer help to those in need.

Let our charity be given with 

an open hand and heart.

We pray for all those who are

homeless today, 

for whatever reason.

Keep them safe on our streets, 

especially from coronavirus,

and let them find the help

they need, not what others

want to give.

Help us all to care for 

each other in these 

difficult times.

Amen

Now off to Burma with " Burmese Days"!!